Impact of age over 70 years in the new allocation system on the outcomes of heart transplantation in the US.

BACKGROUND: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of patients on a ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplant and prioritize sicker people in anticipation of a heart graft. We aimed to assess the impact of patient age in the new allocation policy on mortality following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes included the effect of age ≥70 on post-transplant events, including stroke, dialysis, pacemaker, and rejection requiring treatment. METHODS: The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent heart transplants alone in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups according to their age (over 70 and under 70 years old). RESULTS: Patients aged over 70 were more likely to require dialysis during follow-up, but less likely to experience rejection requiring treatment, compared with patients aged <70. Age ≥70 in the new allocation system was a significant predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.05-1.91; p = .024), but its effect on 5-year mortality was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted HR: 1.27; 95% CI:.97-1.66; p = .077). Undergoing transplantation under the new allocation policy vs the old allocation policy was not a significant predictor of mortality in patients over 70 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Age ≥70 is a significant predictor of 1-year mortality following heart transplantation, but not at 5 and 10 years; however, the new allocation does not seem to have changed the outcomes for this group of patients.

Age Is a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcomes for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Nationwide Analysis.

The 2018 heart allocation system has significantly influenced heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) utilization. Our study aims to investigate age-related outcomes following LVAD implantation in the post-allocation era. Using the National Inpatient Sample, we analyzed data from 7375 patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2019 and 2020. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality following LVAD implantation, stratified by age categories. The age groups were 18-49, 50-59, 60-69, and over 70. These represented 26%, 26%, 31%, and 17% of patients, respectively. Patients aged 60-69 and those over 70 exhibited higher in-hospital mortality rates of 12% and 17%, respectively, compared to younger age groups (7% for 18-49 and 6% for 50-59). The age groups 60-69 and over 70 were independent predictors of mortality, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.99 (p = 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-3.57) and 2.88 (p = 0.002; 95% CI, 1.45-5.71), respectively. Additionally, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with increased in-hospital mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio 1.39; p = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84). Additionally, patients above 70 experienced a statistically shorter length of stay. Nonhome discharge was found to be significantly high across all age categories. However, the difference in hospitalization cost was not statistically significant across the age groups. Our study highlights that patients aged 60 and above face an increased risk of in-hospital mortality following LVAD implantation in the post-allocation era. This study sheds light on age-related outcomes and emphasizes the importance of considering age in LVAD patient selection and management strategies.

Trends and Outcomes Associated With Bariatric Surgery and Pharmacotherapies With Weight Loss Effects Among Patients With Heart Failure and Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Utilization patterns of bariatric surgery among older patients with heart failure (HF), and the associations with cardiovascular outcomes, are not well known. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries with HF and at least class II obesity from 2013 to 2020 were identified with Medicare Provider Analysis and Review 100% inpatient files and Medicare 5% outpatient files. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched to controls in a 1:2 ratio (matched on exact age, sex, race, body mass index, HF encounter year, and HF hospitalization rate pre-surgery/matched period). In an exploratory analysis, patients prescribed pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects (semaglutide, liraglutide, naltrexone-bupropion, or orlistat) were identified and matched to controls with a similar strategy in addition to HF medical therapy data. Cox models evaluated associations between weight loss therapies (as a time-varying covariate) and mortality risk and HF hospitalization rate (calculated as the rate of HF hospitalizations following index HF encounter per 100 person-months) during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 298 101 patients with HF and body mass index ≥35 kg/m2, 2594 (0.9%) underwent bariatric surgery (45% men; mean age, 56.2 years; mean body mass index, 51.5 kg/m2). In propensity-matched analyses over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, bariatric surgery was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.49-0.63]; P<0.001), greater reduction in HF hospitalization rate (rate ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.67-0.77]; P<0.001), and lower atrial fibrillation risk (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]; P=0.006). Use of pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects was low (4.8%), with 96.3% prescribed GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) agonists (semaglutide, 23.6%; liraglutide, 72.7%). In propensity-matched analysis over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, patients receiving pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects (versus matched controls) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.71-0.95]; P=0.007) and HF hospitalization rate (rate ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.77-0.99]; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery and pharmacotherapies with weight loss effects are associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes among older patients with HF and obesity; however, overall utilization remains low.

Impact of new allocation system on length of stay following heart transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation criteria changed in 2018 to accommodate the increased prevalence of ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplant, which consequently prioritized sicker patients. We aimed to assess the impact of this new allocation policy on the length of stay following heart transplantation. Secondary outcomes include other risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and its effect on mortality and postoperative complications. METHODS: The UNOS Registry was queried to identify patients who underwent isolated heart transplants in the United States between 2001 and 2023. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their respective length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 57 020 patients were included, 15 357 of which were allocated with the new system. The median hospital length of stay was 15 days (mean 22.7 days). Length of stay was longer in the new allocation era (25 ± 30 vs. 22 ± 27 days, p < .001). The longer length of stay was associated with increased 5-year mortality in the new allocation system (aHR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.20; p-value: < .001). CONCLUSION: Longer hospital stays and associated observed increased risk for mortality in the era after the allocation criteria change reflect the rationale of this shift which was to prioritize heart transplants for sicker patients. Further studies are needed to track the progress of surgical and perioperative management of these studies over time.

Prominent para-cardiac fat mimicking left atrial appendage thrombus on echocardiography: Utility of cardiac computed tomography.

Transesophageal echocardiography is the most frequently used imaging modality for exclusion of left atrial appendage thrombus prior to cardioversion. Echocardiographers should be aware of rare conditions that may mimic left atrial appendage thrombus. Here, we describe a rare case of prominent para-cardiac fat mimicking left atrial appendage thrombus on transesophageal echocardiographic imaging. Multimodality imaging with cardiac computed tomography was instrumental in providing further anatomical delineation and characterization of the echodensity as prominent para-cardiac fat in this case.

Achieving Equity in Hospital Performance Assessments Using Composite Race-Specific Measures of Risk-Standardized Readmission and Mortality Rates for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: The contemporary measures of hospital performance for heart failure hospitalization and 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) and risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) are estimated using the same risk adjustment model and overall event rate for all patients. Thus, these measures are mainly driven by the care quality and outcomes for the majority racial and ethnic group, and may not adequately represent the hospital performance for patients of Black and other races. METHODS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries from January 2014 to December 2019 hospitalized with heart failure were identified. Hospital-level 30-day RSRR and RSMR were estimated using the traditional race-agnostic models and the race-specific approach. The composite race-specific performance metric was calculated as the average of the RSRR/RMSR measures derived separately for each race and ethnicity group. Correlation and concordance in hospital performance for all patients and patients of Black and other races were assessed using the composite race-specific and race-agnostic metrics. RESULTS: The study included 1 903 232 patients (75.7% White [n=1 439 958]; 14.5% Black [n=276 684]; and 9.8% other races [n=186 590]) with heart failure from 1860 hospitals. There was a modest correlation between hospital-level 30-day performance metrics for patients of White versus Black race (Pearson correlation coefficient: RSRR=0.42; RSMR=0.26). Compared with the race-agnostic RSRR and RSMR, composite race-specific metrics for all patients demonstrated stronger correlation with RSRR (correlation coefficient: 0.60 versus 0.74) and RSMR (correlation coefficient: 0.44 versus 0.51) for Black patients. Concordance in hospital performance for all patients and patients of Black race was also higher with race-specific (versus race-agnostic) metrics (RSRR=64% versus 53% concordantly high-performing; 61% versus 51% concordantly low-performing). Race-specific RSRR and RSMR metrics (versus race-agnostic) led to reclassification in performance ranking of 35.8% and 39.2% of hospitals, respectively, with better 30-day and 1-year outcomes for patients of all race groups at hospitals reclassified as high-performing. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with heart failure, race-specific 30-day RSMR and RSRR are more equitable in representing hospital performance for patients of Black and other races.

Frequency and Impact of Infectious Disease Conditions Diagnosed During Decompensated Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the United States.

There are limited data on the frequency of diagnosis of infectious disease and its impact on patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure. We sought to evaluate the prevalence, types, trends, and outcomes of infectious disease diagnosis in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of heart failure using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2009 to 2019. Patients with a length of stay ≥3 days were included. Patients with chronic dialysis, left ventricular assist devices, cardiogenic shock, or solid organ transplantation or who required mechanical ventilation or mechanical circulatory support were excluded. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of infectious disease diagnosis. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and resource utilization. Among the 7,228,521 admissions with a primary diagnosis of heart failure that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, an infectious disease diagnosis was reported in 1,806,514 (24.9%). Infectious disease diagnosis was more frequent in patients who were female, older, and White, and who had higher baseline co-morbidity. Since 2014, there has been a steady decrease in infectious conditions in patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (p for trend <0.01). After propensity match analysis was performed, patients with infectious disease diagnosis had a longer length of stay (6.9 vs 5.7 days, p <0.001) and higher cost ($14,305 vs $11,760, p <0.001), were less likely to be discharged home (35.3% vs 44.7%, p <0.001), and had higher in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs 1.6%, p <0.001). In conclusion, approximately 1 in 4 patients admitted with primary heart failure will be diagnosed with an infectious condition. The presence of an infectious disease diagnosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Machine learning-based prediction of mortality after heart transplantation in adults with congenital heart disease: A UNOS database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied in Cardiology to predict outcomes and assist in clinical decision-making. We sought to develop and validate an ML model for the prediction of mortality after heart transplantation (HT) in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried from 2000 to 2020 for ACHD patients who underwent isolated HT. The study cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) datasets that were used to train and test a CatBoost ML model. Feature selection was performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Recipient, donor, procedural, and post-transplant characteristics were tested for their ability to predict mortality. We additionally used SHAP for explainability analysis, as well as individualized mortality risk assessment. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1033 recipients (median age 34 years, 61% male). At 1 year after HT, there were 205 deaths (19.9%). Out of a total of 49 variables, 10 were selected as highly predictive of 1-year mortality and were used to train the ML model. Area under the curve (AUC) and predictive accuracy for the 1-year ML model were .80 and 75.2%, respectively, and .69 and 74.2% for the 3-year model, respectively. Based on SHAP analysis, hemodialysis of the recipient post-HT had overall the strongest relative impact on 1-year mortality after HΤ, followed by recipient-estimated glomerular filtration rate, age and ischemic time. CONCLUSIONS: ML models showed satisfactory predictive accuracy of mortality after HT in ACHD and allowed for individualized mortality risk assessment.

Prognostic implications of inactive status in highest urgency categories among heart transplantation recipients in the new donor heart allocation system.

BACKGROUND: Patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) can become inactive or made status seven because of medical reasons, such adverse events, complications, or psychosocial circumstances. If the condition that caused the inactivation is resolved, patients are re- activated. Information about the prognostic implications of Status 7 in the new donor heart allocation system has not been described. To bridge this knowledge gap, we performed an analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. METHODS: Data on adult patients who underwent HT between October 18th, 2018 and October 2021, were queried from the UNOS registry. The main outcomes were post- transplant all-cause mortality, 1-year all-cause mortality and treated acute rejection. Since re-transplantation is a competing event for all-cause mortality, we performed competing risk survival analysis and reported sub distribution hazard ratios (SHR) from the Fine and Gray model to examine the relationship between inactive status and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 5267 adult patients underwent HT and were previously listed as Status 1 or Status 2 in the new allocation system. We identified 946 HT recipients temporarily inactivated while on HT list (18%). The number of temporarily inactive patients remained stable since the implementation of the new donor allocation system (p = .37). Approximately, two-thirds of temporarily inactive patients (65.9%) were inactivated for being too sick, whereas other frequent justifications for inactivity included left ventricular assist device implantation (7.8%) and insurance related issues (4.8%). Temporarily inactive HT recipients were more likely to be African Americans, males, have a higher body mass index (BMI) and significantly longer waiting time (391.6 ± 600 vs. 72.3 ± 223 days, p < .001) compared with never inactivated patients. In the unadjusted analyses 30-day mortality did not differ between groups, but both 1-year and overall all-cause mortality was significantly higher in temporarily inactive patients (1-year: SHR: 1.3; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.03, 1.64; p = .028, overall mortality SHR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.64; p = .014). After adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics, a trend towards higher 1-year and overall mortality remained (1-year: SHR 1.32; 95% CI .99, 1.76, p = .006, overall mortality SHR: 1.29; 95% CI: .98-1.68, p = .065). No differences in treated acute allograft rejection at 1 year were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary inactive status while waiting for HT occurs in approximately one in five HT recipients listed in higher urgency categories after the implementation of the new allocation system. A signal of adverse long-term outcomes was found, and this could be explained by differences in recipient characteristics. Further research is required to elucidate pathways involved and possible implications for clinical practice.

Rejection Requiring Treatment within the First Year following Heart Transplantation: The UNOS Insight.

(1) Background: Heart failure is an extremely impactful health issue from both a social and quality-of-life point of view and the rate of patients with this condition is destined to rise in the next few years. Transplantation remains the mainstay of treatment for end-stage heart failure, but a shortage of organs represents a significant problem that prolongs time spent on the waiting list. In view of this, the selection of donor and recipient must be extremely meticulous, considering all factors that could predispose to organ failure. One of the main considerations regarding heart transplants is the risk of graft rejection and the need for immunosuppression therapy to mitigate that risk. In this study, we aimed to assess the characteristics of patients who need immunosuppression treatment for rejection within one year of heart transplantation and its impact on mid-term and long-term mortality. (2) Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry was queried to identify patients who solely underwent a heart transplant in the US between 2000 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the need for anti-rejection treatment within one year of heart transplantation. Patients' characteristics in the two groups were assessed, and 1 year and 10 year mortality rates were compared. (3) Results: A total of 43,763 patients underwent isolated heart transplantation in the study period, and 9946 (22.7%) needed anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Patients who required treatment for rejection within one year after transplant were more frequently younger (49 ± 14 vs. 52 ± 14 years, p < 0.001), women (31% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), and had a higher CPRA value (14 ± 26 vs. 11 ± 23, p < 0.001). Also, the rate of prior cardiac surgery was more than double in this group (27% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), while prior LVAD (12% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and IABP (10% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) were more frequent in patients who did not receive anti-rejection treatment in the first year. Finally, pre-transplantation creatinine was significantly higher in patients who did not need treatment for rejection in the first year (1.4 vs. 1.3, p < 0.01). Most patients who did not require anti-rejection treatment underwent heart transplantation during the new allocation era, while less than half of the patients who required treatment underwent transplantation after the new allocation policy implementation (65% vs. 49%, p < 0.001). Patients who needed rejection treatment in the first year had a higher risk of unadjusted 1 year (HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.88-2.70; p < 0.001), 5 year (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.60-1.79; p < 0.001), and 10 year (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.41-1.54, p < 0.001) mortality, and this was confirmed at the adjusted analysis at all three time-points. (4) Conclusions: Medical treatment of acute rejection was associated with significantly increased 1 year mortality compared to patients who did not require anti-rejection therapy. The higher risk of mortality was confirmed at a 10 year follow-up. Further studies and newer follow-up data are required to investigate the role of anti-rejection therapy in the heart transplant population.

Impact of Pre-Operative Right Ventricular Response to Hemodynamic Optimization on Outcomes in Patients with LVADs.

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) continues to affect patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and results in increased morbidity and mortality. Information regarding the impact of right ventricular response to pre-operative optimization on outcomes is scarce. Methods: Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent first continuous flow LVAD implantation between 2006 and 2020. Patients with bi-ventricular support before LVAD or without hemodynamic data were excluded. Invasive hemodynamics at baseline and after pre-operative medical and/or temporary circulatory support were recorded. Patients were grouped in the following categories: A: No Hemodynamic RV dysfunction (RVD) at baseline; B: RVD with achievement of RV hemodynamic optimization goals; C: RVD without achievement of RV optimization goals. The main outcomes were right ventricular failure defined as inotropes >14 days after implantation, or postoperative right ventricular mechanical support, and all-cause mortality. Results: Overall, 128 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 58 ±12.5 years, 74.2% were males and, 68.7% had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hemodynamic RVD was present in 70 (54.7%) of the patients at baseline. RV hemodynamic goals were achieved in 46 (79.31%) patients with RVD and in all the patients without RVD at baseline. Failure to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with a significantly higher risk of RVF after LVAD implantation (adjusted OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.14−16.76, p = 0.031) compared with no RVD at baseline and increased 1-year mortality compared with no RVD (adjusted HR 4.1, 95% CI 1.24−13.2, p = 0.02) and optimized RVD (adjusted HR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6−25.2, p = 0.008).Conclusion: Among patients with RVD, the inability to achieve hemodynamic optimization goals was associated with higher rates of RV failure and increased 1-year all-cause mortality post LVAD implantation.

Trends and Outcomes of Patients With Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Listed for Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy (ACM) has been historically underused owing to the risk of amyloid recurrence. METHODS: Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on patients listed for single-organ heart transplant between 2010 and 2019, we evaluated trend in heart transplant and compared waitlist mortality and graft survival between patients with ACM and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Also, we evaluated for independent predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Over the study period, 411 adult patients with ACM were added to the heart transplant waitlist. In the propensity-matched cohorts, the rates of waitlist mortality were significantly higher for ACM compared with DCM (hazard ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.65). Over the study period, 330 patients with ACM underwent heart transplant. The number of transplants increased from 22 in 2010 to 59 in 2019 (168% increase). The 5-year graft survival rate was, however, significantly worse for ACM (78%) compared with DCM (82%) (HR,1.46, 1.03-2.08). We identified 2 predictors of graft failure among patients with ACM: namely, renal failure requiring dialysis (HR, 5.4, 1.6-17) and previous history of malignancy (HR, 1.6, 1.0-28). Patients with ACM with neither risk factor had 5-year graft survivals of 82%, which is comparable with DCM (HR, 1.28, 0.90-1.91). On the other hand, patients with ACM and either risk factor had worse 5-year graft survivals of 62% (HR, 2.44, 1.39-4.28). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing numbers of patients with ACM are undergoing heart transplants. Although patients with ACM experience higher waitlist mortality and worse graft survival compared with DCM, selecting carefully screened ACM patients may result in improved outcomes following heart transplant.

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Class II obesity affects 1 in 5 patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and is considered a potential barrier to heart transplantation (HT). Studies about the outcomes of bariatric surgery in this population are scarce. METHODS: We identified Medicare beneficiaries who had an LVAD placed from 2012 to 2019 and had at least class II obesity at the time of LVAD placement and identified patients who underwent bariatric surgery during or after the LVAD implantation admission. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days (mortality, cerebral hemorrhage, or ischemic stroke) after bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Among patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2012 to 2019, 2798 (19.4%) had at least class II obesity, and 198 (7.1%) patients had bariatric surgery (24 on same admission and 174 after a median of 702 days). After bariatric surgery in LVAD patients, 30-day MACE was 6.1%, 30-day mortality was <5.5%, and 1-year mortality was 12.6%. Heart failure readmission burden declined after bariatric surgery (incidence rate ratio 0.20 (95% CI 0.11-0.38), p < 0.001). Thirty-seven patients underwent HT after a median of 371 days (IQR 246-575 days), and 13 patients underwent LVAD explant due to recovery. On time-dependent, competing risk, Cox regression, bariatric surgery was associated with a 3-fold higher probability of HT in follow-up compared to patients who did not get bariatric surgery (sub-distribution HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.09-4.17, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in patients with LVAD support is associated with decreased heart failure events and higher chances of heart transplantation.

Incidence and Prognostic Implications of Readmissions Caused by Thrombotic Events After a Heart Failure Hospitalization.

Background Readmission occurs in 1 out of 3 patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to study the incidence and prognostic implications of rehospitalizations because of arterial thromboembolism events (ATEs) and venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) after discharge in patients with HF. Methods and Results We identified Medicare beneficiaries who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of HF from 2014 to 2019, with a hospital stay ranging between 3 and10 days, followed by discharge to home. We calculated incidence of ATEs (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or systemic embolism) and VTEs (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) up to 90 days after discharge. Out of 2 953 299 patients admitted with HF during the study period, a total of 585 353 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 36.6% were readmitted within 90 days of discharge. The incidence of readmission due ATEs, VTEs, HF, and all other reasons was 3.4%, 0.5%, 13.2%, and 19.5%, respectively. Incidence of thromboembolic events was highest within 14 days after discharge. Factors associated with ATEs included prior coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular disease and for VTEs included malignancy and prior liver or lung disease. ATE/VTE readmission had a 30-day mortality of 19.9%. After a median follow-up period of 25.6 months, ATE and VTE readmissions were associated with higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 2.76 [95% CI, 2.71-2.81] and 2.17 [95% CI, 2.08-2.27], respectively; P<0.001 for both) compared with no readmission on time-dependent Cox regression. Conclusions After a HF hospitalization, 3.9% of patients were readmitted with a thromboembolic event that was associated with 2- to 3-fold greater risk of mortality in follow-up.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in orthotopic liver transplant recipients: A cohort study using multi-center pooled electronic health record data.

BACKGROUND: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM), or stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is associated with adverse prognosis. Limited data suggest that TCM occurring in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients is associated with elevated peri-operative risk. AIM: To characterize the predictors of TCM in OLT recipients, using a large, multi-center pooled electronic health database. METHODS: A multi-institutional database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA), an aggregate of de-identified electronic health record data from 26 United States healthcare systems was surveyed. A cohort of patients with a Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms of "liver transplant" between 09/2015 and 09/2020 was identified. Subsequently, individuals who developed a new diagnosis of TCM following OLT were identified. Furthermore, the risk associations with TCM among this patient population were characterized using linear regression. RESULTS: Between 09/2015 and 09/2020, of 37718540 patients in the database, 38740 (0.10%) had a history of OLT (60.6% had an age between 18-65 years, 58.1% female). A new diagnosis of TCM was identified in 0.3% of OLT recipients (45.5% had an age between 18-65 years, 72.7% female), compared to 0.04% in non-OLT patients [odds ratio (OR): 7.98, 95% confidence intervals: 6.62-9.63, (P < 0.0001)]. OLT recipients who developed TCM, compared to those who did not, were more likely to be greater than 65 years of age, Caucasian, and female (P < 0.05). There was also a significant association with cardiac arrhythmias, especially ventricular arrhythmias (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: TCM was significantly more likely to occur in LT recipients vs non-recipients. Older age, Caucasian ethnicity, female gender, and presence of arrhythmias were significantly associated with TCM in LT recipients.

Off-Label Use and Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cardiopulmonary Disease.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in clinical practice and have become essential in the management of atrial fibrillation and VTE. The enthusiasm for DOACs has fueled the off-label application of these agents in cardiopulmonary disease, and their use has often outpaced the evidence supporting their application. This article reviews the evidence and current off-label use of DOACs in various cardiopulmonary disease states.